Thursday, April 17, 2014
Compound complex sentence
Working does not have to be a curse from the very depths of Hades; we do not have to hate our job as if our lives depend on it.
Monday, March 3, 2014
Book Review: March 3
Imagine a time when men were actually gentlemen, and balls were an average event where women dressed in beautiful gowns, trying their best to snatch a suitor. Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility pulled me into a lost era of romance and sisterhood.
Characters are one of the main aspects of Austen's books. One character named Marianne really stole my attention. Her passion for life and her innocence make up a huge part of this book. She is always trying to nudge her way into Elinor, her sister's, life. For instance, when a man named Edward Ferris came to visit their house, Marianne did her best to get Elinor to confess her true feelings for Edward, but all Elinor said was that she "thought very highly of him....that I greatly esteem him....that I like him." This of course horrified Marianne who had so much more passion in her heart than Elinor. Marianne has her own romance(s) throughout the book and had her heart broken in the process. She was changed after that, but she somewhat remained the beautiful flower that she was.
One detail that I love about Austen's writing is her use of setting. I was born in the wrong era and country, because I would give anything to have my own Barton Cottage, the main characters' home, in England. London is also described in this book when Elinor, Marianne, and Lucy Steele accompany Mrs. Jennings' to her home there. A ball is thrown and Marianne discovers that her suitor has been engaged to another who has more wealth than she. The ball sounds wonderful with lots of dancing and handsome English men. The houses there are so different and bigger than what we are accustomed to. Why, oh why, was I born here and now?
Gender roles play a huge part in Sense and Sensibility. The women do what women were supposed to do back then such as sewing, playing the piano, and drawing. They dressed in fine gowns for the balls and had their hair extravagantly done. As for the men, in this book they are what me should be: gentlemanly (for the most part), polite, courteous, and some devilishly handsome.(; However, at the same time, I would not have wanted to have lived back then because women had no freedom. Hypothetically, if I were a daughter of a gentleman, and he died, I would have no part of the inheritance. My brother or closest male relative would decide how much money he would give me or (even worse) how much he would give my husband for a dowry!
I highly recommend this book for any girl who dreams of another time. If you like romance, heartbreak, and loss in a book, then this book is all for you! I would not, however, suggest that guys read this book, unless they are really REALLY into romance and such. Austen never fails to give me an escape from reality.
Characters are one of the main aspects of Austen's books. One character named Marianne really stole my attention. Her passion for life and her innocence make up a huge part of this book. She is always trying to nudge her way into Elinor, her sister's, life. For instance, when a man named Edward Ferris came to visit their house, Marianne did her best to get Elinor to confess her true feelings for Edward, but all Elinor said was that she "thought very highly of him....that I greatly esteem him....that I like him." This of course horrified Marianne who had so much more passion in her heart than Elinor. Marianne has her own romance(s) throughout the book and had her heart broken in the process. She was changed after that, but she somewhat remained the beautiful flower that she was.
One detail that I love about Austen's writing is her use of setting. I was born in the wrong era and country, because I would give anything to have my own Barton Cottage, the main characters' home, in England. London is also described in this book when Elinor, Marianne, and Lucy Steele accompany Mrs. Jennings' to her home there. A ball is thrown and Marianne discovers that her suitor has been engaged to another who has more wealth than she. The ball sounds wonderful with lots of dancing and handsome English men. The houses there are so different and bigger than what we are accustomed to. Why, oh why, was I born here and now?
Gender roles play a huge part in Sense and Sensibility. The women do what women were supposed to do back then such as sewing, playing the piano, and drawing. They dressed in fine gowns for the balls and had their hair extravagantly done. As for the men, in this book they are what me should be: gentlemanly (for the most part), polite, courteous, and some devilishly handsome.(; However, at the same time, I would not have wanted to have lived back then because women had no freedom. Hypothetically, if I were a daughter of a gentleman, and he died, I would have no part of the inheritance. My brother or closest male relative would decide how much money he would give me or (even worse) how much he would give my husband for a dowry!
I highly recommend this book for any girl who dreams of another time. If you like romance, heartbreak, and loss in a book, then this book is all for you! I would not, however, suggest that guys read this book, unless they are really REALLY into romance and such. Austen never fails to give me an escape from reality.
Saturday, January 25, 2014
C.C. 3.2
All good things come to those who wait. Well, in China, women have been waiting to climb the ladder for a very long time, and are slowly making their way in society. In the article, "The Sky is the Limit," the Economist describes the ups and downs about being a woman in China.
When people in America have children, they do not really think about how many they want. They just kind of go with the flow. Numbers of births range from 1 to 20. That is not exactly the case in the Chinese society. In the article, the economist states that women still have to abide by the "one-child policy." For me that would be horrendous. I cannot imagine just having one child and stopping. They say the policy is "quite leaky," but I still would want to decide how many children I could have without the government telling me what to do.
Although the number of women who work in China have slowly grown, there is still discrimination in the workplace. Towards the middle of the article, the economist describes a woman who works for a large oil company, and says that she "complains that women suffer from discrimination both in her company and her industry." I am sure there is still discrimination in the American workforce, but we have laws that prohibit that kind of judgement; China does not. I do no think that I could ever work in a place where people put me down all the time because of my gender. Chinese women must be dedicated.
We all have traditions and values that are passed down through our families, but some people will just not let old values go. For instance, in the article the economist describes, "...most Chinese men still expect them to look after a home and family more or less single-handed, whether or not they are holding down a job...These are deep-rooted, hard-to-shift attitudes that long pre-date the Mao era." I understand where the men are coming from, but can't they help their wives out too? I mean, if they are both working, then I think they should both pick up the slack at home. I guess some habits die hard.
This reminds me of a time long ago when women in America had no rights, were expected to stay at home, and be the little doting mother. Hopefullly, women in China will soon have the freedom that we are all blessed with today.
Improvements are being made, and it will take some time. Chinese women are so dedicated that I am sure in the near future they will have reached the top of the ladder.
When people in America have children, they do not really think about how many they want. They just kind of go with the flow. Numbers of births range from 1 to 20. That is not exactly the case in the Chinese society. In the article, the economist states that women still have to abide by the "one-child policy." For me that would be horrendous. I cannot imagine just having one child and stopping. They say the policy is "quite leaky," but I still would want to decide how many children I could have without the government telling me what to do.
Although the number of women who work in China have slowly grown, there is still discrimination in the workplace. Towards the middle of the article, the economist describes a woman who works for a large oil company, and says that she "complains that women suffer from discrimination both in her company and her industry." I am sure there is still discrimination in the American workforce, but we have laws that prohibit that kind of judgement; China does not. I do no think that I could ever work in a place where people put me down all the time because of my gender. Chinese women must be dedicated.
We all have traditions and values that are passed down through our families, but some people will just not let old values go. For instance, in the article the economist describes, "...most Chinese men still expect them to look after a home and family more or less single-handed, whether or not they are holding down a job...These are deep-rooted, hard-to-shift attitudes that long pre-date the Mao era." I understand where the men are coming from, but can't they help their wives out too? I mean, if they are both working, then I think they should both pick up the slack at home. I guess some habits die hard.
This reminds me of a time long ago when women in America had no rights, were expected to stay at home, and be the little doting mother. Hopefullly, women in China will soon have the freedom that we are all blessed with today.
Improvements are being made, and it will take some time. Chinese women are so dedicated that I am sure in the near future they will have reached the top of the ladder.
Sunday, January 19, 2014
C.C. 3.1
In the article titled "Chinese Women Rights," the website informs readers of discrimination still going on in China.
Women in America are so much more privileged than women in China. In a paragraph titled Discrimination in Education and Employment, the author states, "It is hard for most women to get jobs even if they have degrees. Most good jobs are only open to men." I do not think we have any idea how good we, as women, have it. Our rights are so much more advanced than the rights in China.
When we think of men abusing their wives, we are automatically disgusted. Not so in China. This website reveals, "It is found acceptable in some parts of China for men to abuse their wives. There are not any laws to protect women from domestic abuse. Many authorities don't report abuse because they think wife abuse is a family matter." If a woman is abused in America, it simultaneously gets reported and is often heard on the news or found in the newspaper. I just don't understand why the police do not do something about the abuse. Is there no morality?
In the U.S., selling of slaves and brides ended long ago, but in some parts of China, women are being sold like pieces of meat. In the article, the author says, "There are women being sold as brides in the black market. Men who have purchased women don't get arrested meaning that the trade of women is still active. Usually when victims try to escape, they get brutally beaten, imprisoned, and possibly murdered." This sounds like the lake of fire to me. These women have hardly any rights, and although China's economy is improving every day, darker things lurk beneath the surface.
This reminds me of how the women in the Middle East are treated. Many are abused, have no say in their education, and are thrown away like trash.
We believe that are world is thriving, rights are being made, and fairness is taken into account. Unfortunately, we believe a lie.
Women in America are so much more privileged than women in China. In a paragraph titled Discrimination in Education and Employment, the author states, "It is hard for most women to get jobs even if they have degrees. Most good jobs are only open to men." I do not think we have any idea how good we, as women, have it. Our rights are so much more advanced than the rights in China.
When we think of men abusing their wives, we are automatically disgusted. Not so in China. This website reveals, "It is found acceptable in some parts of China for men to abuse their wives. There are not any laws to protect women from domestic abuse. Many authorities don't report abuse because they think wife abuse is a family matter." If a woman is abused in America, it simultaneously gets reported and is often heard on the news or found in the newspaper. I just don't understand why the police do not do something about the abuse. Is there no morality?
In the U.S., selling of slaves and brides ended long ago, but in some parts of China, women are being sold like pieces of meat. In the article, the author says, "There are women being sold as brides in the black market. Men who have purchased women don't get arrested meaning that the trade of women is still active. Usually when victims try to escape, they get brutally beaten, imprisoned, and possibly murdered." This sounds like the lake of fire to me. These women have hardly any rights, and although China's economy is improving every day, darker things lurk beneath the surface.
This reminds me of how the women in the Middle East are treated. Many are abused, have no say in their education, and are thrown away like trash.
We believe that are world is thriving, rights are being made, and fairness is taken into account. Unfortunately, we believe a lie.
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Current Connection: 2.1
In the recent article, "Krokodil: Flesh-eating zombie
drug kills you from the inside out", Jen Christensen, a
journalist for CNN.com, informs her readers of the hideous consequences of this drug and how it is spreading throughout the globe.
In the article, Dr. Abhin Singla, an addiction specialist at Joliet, Illinois' Presence St. Joseph Medical Center, has treated people, he suspects, that have used this drug and says, "It's a zombie drug--it literally kills you from the inside out. If you want to die, this is a way to die." Causing your skin to become black or green and scaly, Krokodil extremely damages your skin. In most cases, patients lost significant amounts of their bodies because of this heroine-like drug.
Also, Dr. Robert Geller, the medical director at Georgia Poison Center, explains the medical effects of Krokodil and states, "The soft tissue damage happens around the injection site. The drug also seems to clump in the veins as it fails to dissolve completely in the blood. The clumps make their way to distant places in the body and start to damage tissue." The drug has not appeared in Georgia yet, but doctors fear that Krokodil will spread quickly. I just do not understand how some people can do this to their bodies and be okay with the consequences? Do they have no common sense?
The fire of Krokodil was started in Russia, and continues to burn throughout the world. Christensen explains in the article, "An estimated 100,000 in Russia and around 20,000 people in Ukraine are estimated to have injected the drug in 2011, according to a study that ran in the International Journal of Drug Policy this year. Experts theorize the drug first spread across Russia and Ukraine when heroin became less available." Made easily and much easier to obtain, Krokodil is a danger that most addicts are to tempted to try. The outlook is not good for these people. Those who cannot get there hands on heroine will turn to the fire.
The effects of this drug remind me of leprosy, in a way. Leprosy, a disease that is not so common today, a very nasty thing to have, made the diseased persons body parts fall off. It was very contagious, and most people were shunned if they had leprosy. Talked about in the Bible, leprosy was probably more common in those days then the sickness is now.
Though there have been no confirmed cases of Krokodil abuse, we all suspect that this is something that does not need to be played with. After all, who wants to be a zombie?
Works Cited
Christensen, Jen. "Krokodil: Flesh eating 'zombie drug' kills you from the inside out." CNN.com.
18 Oct. 2013. Web. 9 Nov. 2013.
Monday, October 14, 2013
CC: 1.2
We all know that religion in schools is all very "hush-hush," and Jesus is not really talked about by the teachers. Well, one teacher decided to incorporate the Christian God in a very unusual way. In Todd Starnes' article, on Foxnews.com, entitled "Professor Makes Students 'Stomp on Jesus,'" he exposes this educational scandal by voicing the opinions of the Professor's students.
In his article, Starnes explains that the students of the Professor's Intercultural Communications class "told the students to write the name 'Jesus' on a sheet of paper. Then, they were told to put the paper on the floor." Later in the article, Starnes reveals that they were told to "stomp on it." Of course there would be obvious dissension with this lesson. Jesus is the symbol of Christianity, and being told to stomp on that name would outrage many people, including myself.
Ryan Rotela, a devout Mormon and student of Florida Atlantic University, obviously had the same views. In the text, Rotela "picked up the paper from the floor and put it right back on the table." Rotela later stated to Deandre Poole, the instructor of that class, that "the assignment was insulting and offensive." I am sure that Professor Poole expected this kind of debate but did not expect that it would be taken to heart. The overall theme of the lesson was to "discuss the importance of symbols in culture;" however, I do not think that the Professor was ever allowed to explain that important detail. Poole was suspended.
Rotela explained his views in the article and stated to the television station, "Any time you stomp on something it shows you believe that it has no value. If you stomp on the word Jesus -- it says the word has no value." If someone stomps on a bug, no one really gives a second thought to it. The bug is not significant. Apparently, Jesus was not significant to whoever stomped on that piece of paper.
Everyday Jesus is getting smaller and smaller in schools. Our pledge that we say every morning at school states that we are "one nation under God," but we're not really under God anymore, are we? This article just proves that religion is becoming a topic of insignificance.
What will they think of next? Burning the American flag? Perhaps, they will stomp on the name Mohammed next. I would not be surprised.
In his article, Starnes explains that the students of the Professor's Intercultural Communications class "told the students to write the name 'Jesus' on a sheet of paper. Then, they were told to put the paper on the floor." Later in the article, Starnes reveals that they were told to "stomp on it." Of course there would be obvious dissension with this lesson. Jesus is the symbol of Christianity, and being told to stomp on that name would outrage many people, including myself.
Ryan Rotela, a devout Mormon and student of Florida Atlantic University, obviously had the same views. In the text, Rotela "picked up the paper from the floor and put it right back on the table." Rotela later stated to Deandre Poole, the instructor of that class, that "the assignment was insulting and offensive." I am sure that Professor Poole expected this kind of debate but did not expect that it would be taken to heart. The overall theme of the lesson was to "discuss the importance of symbols in culture;" however, I do not think that the Professor was ever allowed to explain that important detail. Poole was suspended.
Rotela explained his views in the article and stated to the television station, "Any time you stomp on something it shows you believe that it has no value. If you stomp on the word Jesus -- it says the word has no value." If someone stomps on a bug, no one really gives a second thought to it. The bug is not significant. Apparently, Jesus was not significant to whoever stomped on that piece of paper.
Everyday Jesus is getting smaller and smaller in schools. Our pledge that we say every morning at school states that we are "one nation under God," but we're not really under God anymore, are we? This article just proves that religion is becoming a topic of insignificance.
What will they think of next? Burning the American flag? Perhaps, they will stomp on the name Mohammed next. I would not be surprised.
Monday, September 16, 2013
CC: 1.1
For the past couple of years, we have all heard that video games rot our brains. Not so! In the recent article Disruptions: Minecraft, an Obsession and and Educational Tool, Nick Bilton's assuring facts explain the positive and negative sides for this hit video game.
Video games in school? How is this possible??? Nick Bilton shows this abomination to be true in his article and states, "Earlier this year, for example, a school in Stockholm made Minecraft compulsory for 13-year-old students. 'They learn about city planning, environmental issues, getting things done, and even how to plan for the future,' said Monica Ekman, a teacher at the Viktor Rydberg school." Creativity is becoming crucial in this world, seeing how left brain thinking is being overtaken by right brain thinking. Minecraft is just one more thing that is helping this concept along.
This is not the only perk to playing Minecraft. In the article, Bilton interviews Joel Levin, co-founder of TeacherGaming that runs MinecraftEdu, which helps teachers play along with their students. Levin describes, "Kids are getting into middle school and high school and having some ugly experiences on Facebook and other social networks without an understanding of how to interact with people online. With Minecraft, they are developing that understanding at a very early age." In today's world, computers are a huge part of our society. Why not learn more about communicating on the internet while you can? It's not such a bad thing!
However, with every up, there is a down. Too much good stuff is bad stuff! Professor Klopfer is also mentioned in the article and he warns, "...as with anything...there is such a thing as too much Minecraft." Even though this game is used as an education tool, it has the power to (as we say) rot our brains, if the zombies in Minecraft do not get to them first!(: Mwahahahahahah.
This article really stuck out because my little brother is ADDICTED to Minecraft. He has the Minecraft app on his i-pod ( the full version) and the X-box game. To me, all he is doing is building a bunch of stuff, but hey! If this game enhances his brain power then I say, "GAME ON!" He needs all he can get. Ha!
This world is rapidly changing into something that is ruled by computers. Almost everything we do involves them. Video games in school bring us one step closer to them overtaking the world! *Cue music of doom*
Video games in school? How is this possible??? Nick Bilton shows this abomination to be true in his article and states, "Earlier this year, for example, a school in Stockholm made Minecraft compulsory for 13-year-old students. 'They learn about city planning, environmental issues, getting things done, and even how to plan for the future,' said Monica Ekman, a teacher at the Viktor Rydberg school." Creativity is becoming crucial in this world, seeing how left brain thinking is being overtaken by right brain thinking. Minecraft is just one more thing that is helping this concept along.
This is not the only perk to playing Minecraft. In the article, Bilton interviews Joel Levin, co-founder of TeacherGaming that runs MinecraftEdu, which helps teachers play along with their students. Levin describes, "Kids are getting into middle school and high school and having some ugly experiences on Facebook and other social networks without an understanding of how to interact with people online. With Minecraft, they are developing that understanding at a very early age." In today's world, computers are a huge part of our society. Why not learn more about communicating on the internet while you can? It's not such a bad thing!
However, with every up, there is a down. Too much good stuff is bad stuff! Professor Klopfer is also mentioned in the article and he warns, "...as with anything...there is such a thing as too much Minecraft." Even though this game is used as an education tool, it has the power to (as we say) rot our brains, if the zombies in Minecraft do not get to them first!(: Mwahahahahahah.
This article really stuck out because my little brother is ADDICTED to Minecraft. He has the Minecraft app on his i-pod ( the full version) and the X-box game. To me, all he is doing is building a bunch of stuff, but hey! If this game enhances his brain power then I say, "GAME ON!" He needs all he can get. Ha!
This world is rapidly changing into something that is ruled by computers. Almost everything we do involves them. Video games in school bring us one step closer to them overtaking the world! *Cue music of doom*
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Fiction is not my thing
Against my will, I am writing a short story. Do not get me wrong, I love, love, LOVE reading. Reading someone else's imagination is a lot easier than writing my own creative thinking. I am sure being an author will be a struggle.
As horrible as writing may sound, creating the characters is pretty fun. Going on Hero Machine and getting to form my characters helped me to visualize the actual appearance. There were so many options to choose from and those choices assisted me in compsing my short story.
Beforehand, I have written that fiction is not exactly my cup of tea. I am not joking. Fashioning this story into existence might be one of the hardest things I have ever done. I can produce some of the most amazing creations on canvas, but put a pencil in my hand and say "Write..," I am doomed for weeks of brain farts.
As I was shaping the main person in my story, I knew that she had to be different. As a result, I gave her red flaming hair and fiery blue eyes. She needed to be tough and stubborn on the inside and outside, so she holds a gun with a roll of ammunition crossing her torso. Her pants are torn giving her an "I can go through anything" look. My character's stance is proud and and firm showing she know what she is doing and why.
This story will not be easy. I am sure some will just breeze right through this project with ease and confidence, but me, ha, I am just gonna roll with the punches. Wish me luck!
As horrible as writing may sound, creating the characters is pretty fun. Going on Hero Machine and getting to form my characters helped me to visualize the actual appearance. There were so many options to choose from and those choices assisted me in compsing my short story.
Beforehand, I have written that fiction is not exactly my cup of tea. I am not joking. Fashioning this story into existence might be one of the hardest things I have ever done. I can produce some of the most amazing creations on canvas, but put a pencil in my hand and say "Write..," I am doomed for weeks of brain farts.
As I was shaping the main person in my story, I knew that she had to be different. As a result, I gave her red flaming hair and fiery blue eyes. She needed to be tough and stubborn on the inside and outside, so she holds a gun with a roll of ammunition crossing her torso. Her pants are torn giving her an "I can go through anything" look. My character's stance is proud and and firm showing she know what she is doing and why.
This story will not be easy. I am sure some will just breeze right through this project with ease and confidence, but me, ha, I am just gonna roll with the punches. Wish me luck!
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
BR 2: Down Where My Love Lives
 |
| http://charlesmartinbooks.com/blog/entry/down_where_my_love_lives |
Conversation with a Character
Clarissa: "Hi Maggie. How are you today?"
Maggie: "Just fine. I'm a little tired of doing interviews."
Clarissa: "I'm not surprised. You're famous now that your 'alive' again. How long were you in that coma?"
Maggie: "Four months. Dylan said those months felt like years."
Clarissa: "Dylan is your husband, correct?"
Maggie: "Yes, Dylan is my husband, and a good one too. I don't know how he waited that long for me."
Clarissa: "It must have been true love. You two are meant for each other, and now that you have went through this, I'm sure you can go through anything."
Maggie: "This really has been a rough ride for both of us. Losing that first child was awful, but.....losing the twins was a nightmare."
Clarissa: "Wow, it sounds terrible. I don't know how you've stayed so strong."
Maggie: "Dylan has been my rock. Our friends, Amos and Amanda, have really helped us though this time also."
Clarissa: "Is there still a chance that you can have children, or is that goal nearly impossible?"
Maggie: "Yes, there is still a good chance that we can have a family, but every time we try, the attempt usually fails. That is why we're looking into adoption."
Clarissa: "And how is that process coming?"
Maggie: "Unfortunately, I don't think that the adoption agency will let us adopt. They view me as 'emotionally unstable.' Another bad factor that the agency got a good look at is our house. A gang had recently burned it down, so of course they will probably assume that our environment is always unsafe."
Clarissa: "Again, I am amazed at how you have stayed sane. I'm sure I would go crazy. I would love to talk to you more, but I'm afraid this is all I have time for. Thanks for coming."
Maggie: "Thank you for inviting me."
A Different Ending
Clarissa: "Personally, I love your story, but I think it needs a new ending."
Maggie: "Oh, and how would you change the end?"
Clarissa: "Well, first of all, I would make you actually have a kid before the book ends."
Maggie: "I like that idea, but how?"
Clarissa: "Instead of both the twins dying, I would have at least one of them survive. Losing both children is just too sad. You need a little happiness in your life."
Maggie: "But the book ends leaving you thinking that I will eventually have children."
Clarissa: "Then I would make an epilogue a few years later displaying the scene of a happy family with your front yard scattered with toys. A little girl with your Audrey Hepburn hair and Bettie Davis eyes would be sitting in Dylan's lap, while you and the smaller replica of your husband would be running through the corn fields in front of your house."
Maggie: *sigh* "That's my every day dream. I just wish that would happen. I know Dylan wants kids and it breaks my heart that I can't give him what he wants."
Clarissa: "Well, he has you. One day, I believe you will have children and make Dylan the happiest Dad alive."
Maggie: "I sure hope so. I love your ending, I only wish that it was real."
Clarissa: "Someday, it will be. God has a plan."
Maggie: "God was Dylan's rock throughout the coma. I can only hope that He will get us through the years to come."
Clarissa: "He will. Well, time's up today. Thank you for sharing your story."
Maggie: "No, thank you for sharing yours."
THE END
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Current Connection: Feb 25
When you go to big cities, there are always homeless people lined up on the streets jingling their cups for spare change to make it through the week. On the CNN website, in Dana Ford's article, Donations pour in for homeless man who returned diamond ring she explains a story of true character that we do not often see in the world.
As we all know, homeless people do not have much money. When the opportunity of "quick cash" arises, they usually take that opportunity. However, Billy Ray Harris did not. Ford explains, "Well-wishers from around the world are opening their wallets to a homeless man who returned a diamond engagement ring to its rightful owner, after she accidentally dropped it in his donation cup." If I had lost my engagement ring, I would be, literally, freaking out. Even without my class ring I feel naked.
As we all know, homeless people do not have much money. When the opportunity of "quick cash" arises, they usually take that opportunity. However, Billy Ray Harris did not. Ford explains, "Well-wishers from around the world are opening their wallets to a homeless man who returned a diamond engagement ring to its rightful owner, after she accidentally dropped it in his donation cup." If I had lost my engagement ring, I would be, literally, freaking out. Even without my class ring I feel naked.
Now, I'm thinking how on Earth did this woman lose her ENGAGEMENT RING? She had better have a pretty good reason, and she did. Ford states, "She almost never takes it off, but it was giving her a bit of a rash so she did, zipping it in her coin purse for safe keeping....Later, she absentmindedly
emptied the contents of that purse into the collection cup of Billy Ray
Harris, who is homeless and often stays under a bridge in Darling's
hometown. It wasn't until the next day that she realized her ring was gone." People would probably think that Harris would run off with the ring, cash it in, and be set to live comfortably for a while. Despite his title and everyone's assumptions, Harris did not run away with the ring but instead he gave the ring back when Sarah Darling came inquiring for her lost treasure the next day.
To show them their thanks, Darling and her fiance helped Harris out a little. In her article, Ford says, "To show their appreciation, Darling and her husband set up an online
fundraiser for Harris. The donations and praise have poured in....So far, in about a week, more than 3,400 donations have been made,
totaling nearly $95,000. The money will be given to Harris at the end of
a 90-day campaign." That is one lucky man!!! Looks like having good character pays off in the end!
If I were homeless, I would have ran away with that thing as fast as possible. However, I am glad that there are still people like Billy Ray Harris in the world.
There is a saying that says "what goes around comes around" so I guess Billy deserved what came around for what he did. Hopefully, there are a lot more people like him.
Friday, February 15, 2013
The Piano
In certain movies, there is a piano. Someone usually plays that piano in the movie and when they do, the piano sings and the player's fingers glide across the keys. I have been playing the piano for about four years now and sometimes learning the art is a challenge. Although, practicing music calms me in a way that nothing else can. The music that comes from the instrument seems to have a life of its own. I enjoy being the one who makes it live.
I am not going to lie; playing the piano is a ton of work. I practice for 30 minutes a day, and I have most definitely not acquired the skills that I want to have. In the beginning playing was easy, but as I progressed, the music became a new language. The notes were either dangerously low or high above the staff, the treble and bass clefs. Becoming the pianist I want to be will not be an easy task. I have so much further to go in my lessons and I am sure playing will only become even more trying.
I have played many pieces of music in my four years (going on five). I started out with different books containing very simplified versions of real pieces, scales, and chords. Now I am a lot more advanced than I used to be. Practice makes perfect! Although I am far from perfect, the pieces I play now are at least 4 to 5 pages long. The works I am currently practicing are Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata and Mozart's Turkish March. The first is 5 pages and the second is 6 pages long. Moonlight Sonata is a very slow song, and the Turkish March is super duper fast. I'm having a lot of fun with both.
If you have seen a piano before, you know that there are white keys and black keys. The white keys are the "natural" keys, whereas the black keys are either "sharps" or "flats." I know this probably sounds confusing, but the specifics become second nature once you get the main stuff down. The notes have a specific name. The white keys are named a, b, c, d, e, f, g and then the naming system starts all over again. As you go up the keyboard, the black keys are A sharp or #, B#, C#, D#, E#, F#, and G#. As you move down the piano, the black keys become "flat," and the names of them are A flat, B flat, C flat, D flat, F flat, and G flat. Learning the notes becomes simpler over time.
Music is like a river; it speeds up, but then at a moments notice, slows down. Pieces can have very soft music (pp), just soft enough to be quieter (p), having a normal loudness (mf), or being louder than usual (f). Music also has crescendo's, which means the music builds volume over a series of notes. There are staccato's that makes the note abrupt and short. The symbol of a staccato is usually a dot over a note. There are lots of other things I cannot think off the top of my head, but in short, piano music is usually very complicated.
A word of advice: DO NOT start piano lessons if the heart is not fully into the music. Playing, as I said before, is very hard work and takes a lot of patience. Contradictory to what I just said, the piano is also so much fun and when you learn how to play a song, the feeling is indescribable. The piano is an overall enjoyable instrument, and I recommend that if you want to learn, go for it!
I am not going to lie; playing the piano is a ton of work. I practice for 30 minutes a day, and I have most definitely not acquired the skills that I want to have. In the beginning playing was easy, but as I progressed, the music became a new language. The notes were either dangerously low or high above the staff, the treble and bass clefs. Becoming the pianist I want to be will not be an easy task. I have so much further to go in my lessons and I am sure playing will only become even more trying.
I have played many pieces of music in my four years (going on five). I started out with different books containing very simplified versions of real pieces, scales, and chords. Now I am a lot more advanced than I used to be. Practice makes perfect! Although I am far from perfect, the pieces I play now are at least 4 to 5 pages long. The works I am currently practicing are Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata and Mozart's Turkish March. The first is 5 pages and the second is 6 pages long. Moonlight Sonata is a very slow song, and the Turkish March is super duper fast. I'm having a lot of fun with both.
If you have seen a piano before, you know that there are white keys and black keys. The white keys are the "natural" keys, whereas the black keys are either "sharps" or "flats." I know this probably sounds confusing, but the specifics become second nature once you get the main stuff down. The notes have a specific name. The white keys are named a, b, c, d, e, f, g and then the naming system starts all over again. As you go up the keyboard, the black keys are A sharp or #, B#, C#, D#, E#, F#, and G#. As you move down the piano, the black keys become "flat," and the names of them are A flat, B flat, C flat, D flat, F flat, and G flat. Learning the notes becomes simpler over time.
Music is like a river; it speeds up, but then at a moments notice, slows down. Pieces can have very soft music (pp), just soft enough to be quieter (p), having a normal loudness (mf), or being louder than usual (f). Music also has crescendo's, which means the music builds volume over a series of notes. There are staccato's that makes the note abrupt and short. The symbol of a staccato is usually a dot over a note. There are lots of other things I cannot think off the top of my head, but in short, piano music is usually very complicated.
A word of advice: DO NOT start piano lessons if the heart is not fully into the music. Playing, as I said before, is very hard work and takes a lot of patience. Contradictory to what I just said, the piano is also so much fun and when you learn how to play a song, the feeling is indescribable. The piano is an overall enjoyable instrument, and I recommend that if you want to learn, go for it!
Monday, February 11, 2013
CC#3: Feb. 11
Imagine being on a cruise and getting away from all the struggles of life and just relaxing.Suddenly, the captain's voice comes over the speakers, "Folks, the engine just caught fire and we are going to be stuck for a while. Sorry for the inconvenience." CNN staff reports this story in the recent article Carnival cruise ship to be towed after fire strands it in Gulf of Mexico and explain the situation that the cruise ship was in.
The passengers were obviously in a pickle, and did not expect their vacation to become a "trip gone bad." The news reporters state in the article, "The Carnival Triumph was about 150 miles off the coast of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula, heading back to Galveston, Texas, when the fire broke out in an engine room Sunday morning, according to Carnival Cruise Lines. The ship's automatic fire extinguishing system kicked in and soon contained the blaze, and no injuries were reported, Carnival said Monday." Thankfully, nobody was hurt down in the engine room and the crew got to the fire and controlled the accident before anyone was seriously injured. The ship was still in deep water and only going about two miles an hour, so the ship was out of trouble.
Brent Nutt spoke with his wife who was on the ship and says, "She said they had no power, no running water, and she said she hadn't been able to eat anything yet." That problem was soon solved and "guests have been supplied with food and refreshments throughout yesterday and this morning and the ship has supplies on board to last until the vessel returns to port," states Carnival. The electricity was soon turned back on with emergency generators, and people were actually able to use the toilets again! Man, that would be awful to be without a toilet.
All of this trouble kind of has benefits. The cruise line said, "After being towed to Progreso, those aboard the Carnival Triumph will be flown back to the United States at no cost to them, the cruise line said. They will also get a full refund, credit that can be used toward a future trip and reimbursement for all expenses, except casino and gift shop purchases." Even though, the trip was not all that great, maybe the discounted one will go a lot smoother! If the passengers would have had to pay, I am sure there would have been many unhappy people.
I do not know why, but this incident kind of reminds me of the Titanic. None of the Carnival passengers died, but them being stranded out in the ocean makes me remember the tragedy of the Titanic. I have never been on a cruise, but I do not intend to get on one after all these stories!
In conclusion, many passengers on this cruise had their vacation ruined, but everything worked out in the end.
The passengers were obviously in a pickle, and did not expect their vacation to become a "trip gone bad." The news reporters state in the article, "The Carnival Triumph was about 150 miles off the coast of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula, heading back to Galveston, Texas, when the fire broke out in an engine room Sunday morning, according to Carnival Cruise Lines. The ship's automatic fire extinguishing system kicked in and soon contained the blaze, and no injuries were reported, Carnival said Monday." Thankfully, nobody was hurt down in the engine room and the crew got to the fire and controlled the accident before anyone was seriously injured. The ship was still in deep water and only going about two miles an hour, so the ship was out of trouble.
Brent Nutt spoke with his wife who was on the ship and says, "She said they had no power, no running water, and she said she hadn't been able to eat anything yet." That problem was soon solved and "guests have been supplied with food and refreshments throughout yesterday and this morning and the ship has supplies on board to last until the vessel returns to port," states Carnival. The electricity was soon turned back on with emergency generators, and people were actually able to use the toilets again! Man, that would be awful to be without a toilet.
All of this trouble kind of has benefits. The cruise line said, "After being towed to Progreso, those aboard the Carnival Triumph will be flown back to the United States at no cost to them, the cruise line said. They will also get a full refund, credit that can be used toward a future trip and reimbursement for all expenses, except casino and gift shop purchases." Even though, the trip was not all that great, maybe the discounted one will go a lot smoother! If the passengers would have had to pay, I am sure there would have been many unhappy people.
I do not know why, but this incident kind of reminds me of the Titanic. None of the Carnival passengers died, but them being stranded out in the ocean makes me remember the tragedy of the Titanic. I have never been on a cruise, but I do not intend to get on one after all these stories!
In conclusion, many passengers on this cruise had their vacation ruined, but everything worked out in the end.
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Book Review #1: Feb. 1
Imagine a world where wizards and witches exist. Flying brooms, spells, and all types of magic are just a normal part of life. J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series sucks you into a realm where all this and more is possible.
One theme of this series is pretty much Good vs. Evil. Voldemort, the mortal enemy of just about every wizard (except for his followers, the Death Eaters), plans to take over the world killing the main character, Harry Potter, in the process. Harry Potter has to war with the evil inside of him and kill Voldemort before Voldemort kills him: both cannot survive at the same time. With the help of his friends including Professor Dumbledore, Hermione, Ron, Neville, and many others, Harry strives to save the world from utter destruction.
There are so many characters in this book, it is almost confusing. So, I will just describe the main characters. Harry Potter, the star of the books, is an orphan boy trying to "fit in" in the "muggle" (human) world. He's just different, and then he finds out that he is a wizard! How crazy would that be? So he goes and trains at a school called Hogwarts and has amazing and frightening experiences there. He also meets Hermione and Ron, his two best friends in the series. Hermione is a goody two-shoes who is always the best at every class. Ron is Harry's awkward and clumsy friend who always messes up everything. Professor Dumbledore helps Harry along his journey to defeat Voldemort and wizard and muggle lives.
The story mostly takes place at Hogwarts, a training school for young wizards and witches. The school is protected by a shield that mostly keeps dark magic out. It is where Harry meets all his friends and his enemies, like the kids from Slytherin.
I was kind of skeptical of these books at first because I am not really into the whole "wizard" stuff, but once I started reading them, I could not stop. The movies are good, but they are NOTHING compared to the books. So, READ THE BOOKS! THEY ARE AMAZING!
One theme of this series is pretty much Good vs. Evil. Voldemort, the mortal enemy of just about every wizard (except for his followers, the Death Eaters), plans to take over the world killing the main character, Harry Potter, in the process. Harry Potter has to war with the evil inside of him and kill Voldemort before Voldemort kills him: both cannot survive at the same time. With the help of his friends including Professor Dumbledore, Hermione, Ron, Neville, and many others, Harry strives to save the world from utter destruction.
There are so many characters in this book, it is almost confusing. So, I will just describe the main characters. Harry Potter, the star of the books, is an orphan boy trying to "fit in" in the "muggle" (human) world. He's just different, and then he finds out that he is a wizard! How crazy would that be? So he goes and trains at a school called Hogwarts and has amazing and frightening experiences there. He also meets Hermione and Ron, his two best friends in the series. Hermione is a goody two-shoes who is always the best at every class. Ron is Harry's awkward and clumsy friend who always messes up everything. Professor Dumbledore helps Harry along his journey to defeat Voldemort and wizard and muggle lives.
The story mostly takes place at Hogwarts, a training school for young wizards and witches. The school is protected by a shield that mostly keeps dark magic out. It is where Harry meets all his friends and his enemies, like the kids from Slytherin.
I was kind of skeptical of these books at first because I am not really into the whole "wizard" stuff, but once I started reading them, I could not stop. The movies are good, but they are NOTHING compared to the books. So, READ THE BOOKS! THEY ARE AMAZING!
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Current Connections #2
In a recent article on CNN Hundreds killed in Brazil nightclub fire, reporters Shasta Darlington, Marilia Brocchetto, and Helena DeMoura record the tragic story of a southern Brazilian nightclub catching fire early on Sunday.
The ladies state, "The blaze at the Kiss nightclub in Santa Maria killed at least 232 people, many of whom apparently died from smoke inhalation, state-run Agencia Brasil reported, citing fire officials. Others were trampled in the rush for the exits, one security guard told CNN affiliate Band News. More than 130 people were hospitalized, Agencia Brasil said." The fire started because the acoustic insulation caught on fire. No one knows how the fire started: the police are still investigating the cause.
According to the text, "About 2,000 people were inside the club when the fire broke out -- double the maximum capacity of 1,000, said Guido de Melo, a state fire official." Maybe if the club had only had 1,000 people in it, more lives could have been saved. There were not enough exits for everyone to get out.
Many families called their loved ones when they found out the fire had taken place; some did not answer. In the story, the reporters say, "Desperate families and friends wept as they searched for information outside a local gymnasium where bodies were taken for identification later Sunday. Inside, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff met with some of them as they waited on bleachers for word of their loved ones." The president had recently been on a trip, but cut the vacation short when she received the news. That was good of her to be there for her people in their hour of need.
This sort of reminds me of 9/11. there was not nearly as many deaths, but many people died by the blaze, smoke inhalation, or the roof collapsing; the same causes of death as 9/11.
We can only pray for those who have lost loved ones, or those who are still in critical condition.
The ladies state, "The blaze at the Kiss nightclub in Santa Maria killed at least 232 people, many of whom apparently died from smoke inhalation, state-run Agencia Brasil reported, citing fire officials. Others were trampled in the rush for the exits, one security guard told CNN affiliate Band News. More than 130 people were hospitalized, Agencia Brasil said." The fire started because the acoustic insulation caught on fire. No one knows how the fire started: the police are still investigating the cause.
According to the text, "About 2,000 people were inside the club when the fire broke out -- double the maximum capacity of 1,000, said Guido de Melo, a state fire official." Maybe if the club had only had 1,000 people in it, more lives could have been saved. There were not enough exits for everyone to get out.
Many families called their loved ones when they found out the fire had taken place; some did not answer. In the story, the reporters say, "Desperate families and friends wept as they searched for information outside a local gymnasium where bodies were taken for identification later Sunday. Inside, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff met with some of them as they waited on bleachers for word of their loved ones." The president had recently been on a trip, but cut the vacation short when she received the news. That was good of her to be there for her people in their hour of need.
This sort of reminds me of 9/11. there was not nearly as many deaths, but many people died by the blaze, smoke inhalation, or the roof collapsing; the same causes of death as 9/11.
We can only pray for those who have lost loved ones, or those who are still in critical condition.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
The American Dream
To me, the American Dream is what people want to do with their lives. My dream is not necessarily one big goal, but rather a series of many small achievements or ideas. Striving for what is important to me is a big part of my American dream, and I intend to acquire everything that I want in this life.
As soon as I finish high school with a fresh diploma in my hand, that fall I will be looking for a college to derive my education. What I really want is to go to Bible College in either St. Louis or Texas. There, I could further my talent of singing, playing the piano, building the foundation of my relationship with God, and receiving my normal education in the meantime. I do not know what degree I need to become what I want to become, but I intend to research that career and find out. Hopefully, I will not be in school too long.
Whatever it takes, I will become a librarian. Reading books is a major hobby for me, and I cannot imagine doing anything else. I want to spend my life doing something I enjoy, not moping around complaining about how boring and unexciting my job is. Being a librarian is the only thing I can picture myself doing. I love reading: being surrounded by books, and helping people get the perfect book would just make my day every day. I may be a book worm, but that is part of who I am.
Every girl dreams of getting married. That is number three on my list. I pray to God that I will meet a dark-haired, dark-eyed guy in Bible College who loves God as much as I do, if not more. He would be perfect for me and I would be perfect for him. We could build our life together after we get married, living out in the country surrounded by nature but not too far from town. I want 4 kids or less, and no more. I could take them to school and tuck them in every night. My husband would mainly support us, since a librarian does not make alot of money. We would grow old together, rocking on the front porch surrounded by our children and grandchildren. I know life would not be all peaches and cream, but I still want to be a happy woman with everything I need.
So basically, I want what every person wants; a life filled with accomplished goals and dreams. I want a future that is bright and chalked full of good surprises. Having strength, I can overcome the bad times. That is my Amercian Dream.
As soon as I finish high school with a fresh diploma in my hand, that fall I will be looking for a college to derive my education. What I really want is to go to Bible College in either St. Louis or Texas. There, I could further my talent of singing, playing the piano, building the foundation of my relationship with God, and receiving my normal education in the meantime. I do not know what degree I need to become what I want to become, but I intend to research that career and find out. Hopefully, I will not be in school too long.
Whatever it takes, I will become a librarian. Reading books is a major hobby for me, and I cannot imagine doing anything else. I want to spend my life doing something I enjoy, not moping around complaining about how boring and unexciting my job is. Being a librarian is the only thing I can picture myself doing. I love reading: being surrounded by books, and helping people get the perfect book would just make my day every day. I may be a book worm, but that is part of who I am.
Every girl dreams of getting married. That is number three on my list. I pray to God that I will meet a dark-haired, dark-eyed guy in Bible College who loves God as much as I do, if not more. He would be perfect for me and I would be perfect for him. We could build our life together after we get married, living out in the country surrounded by nature but not too far from town. I want 4 kids or less, and no more. I could take them to school and tuck them in every night. My husband would mainly support us, since a librarian does not make alot of money. We would grow old together, rocking on the front porch surrounded by our children and grandchildren. I know life would not be all peaches and cream, but I still want to be a happy woman with everything I need.
So basically, I want what every person wants; a life filled with accomplished goals and dreams. I want a future that is bright and chalked full of good surprises. Having strength, I can overcome the bad times. That is my Amercian Dream.
Monday, January 14, 2013
Current Connection: Jan 14
In a recent article "Gun violence task force meets video game leaders as debate continues", Mariano Castillo explians the world wide debate on how to control guns and violent video games.
Castillo says that Joe Biden, our nation's vice president, met with the game leaders on Friday, and Biden says, " 'We know there is no single answer and, quite frankly, we don't even know whether some of the things people think impact on this (gun violence) actually impact on it or not,' Biden said just before the meeting, stressing that video game industry officials are among 'a whole lot of people' participating in the discussion." This nation cannot control gun violence, but our government is taking every precaution to at least lower the crime rate. However so people are not to happy about that, such as the game makers. They will lose alot of money if the states ban violent video games.
Some states are not waiting for the government to step in, such as Massachusettes. Castillo states, "in Massachusetts, action has been taken against violent video games. Specifically, operators of four rest stops have removed -- at the state's request -- arcade games with guns or 'shooting components,' said Sara Lavoie, a spokeswoman for Massachusetts' Department of Transportation." I do not think that video games are the sole reason for the violence going on in the country, but it desensitizes the player from the real world and causes them to have those images ingrained in their minds. Violent arcade games should not be at state funded rest stops.
Massachusettes is not the only state working on weeding out violence. Castillo explains, "In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal -- like Dewhurst, a Republican -- on Friday proposed legislation to join 17 other states and make mental health records part of the screening criteria for federal background checks to buy firearms." To me, this is a wonderful idea. Guns are not the bad guys, but the one who shoots the gun to intentionally hurt someone should not be allowed to purchase a weapon.
In my opinion, violent video games are not the big cause to mass destruction. The person who is the one that holds the gun should be to blame. I do not the think the government should take away our guns because then what would we have to protect ourselves. Complete gun control is not the answer.
Due to the mass murder in Conneticut, the U.S. is in a tail spin looking for the right answer. What would this world be without guns? Remember that it is not the guns fault, but the person who uses that gun is to blame.
Castillo says that Joe Biden, our nation's vice president, met with the game leaders on Friday, and Biden says, " 'We know there is no single answer and, quite frankly, we don't even know whether some of the things people think impact on this (gun violence) actually impact on it or not,' Biden said just before the meeting, stressing that video game industry officials are among 'a whole lot of people' participating in the discussion." This nation cannot control gun violence, but our government is taking every precaution to at least lower the crime rate. However so people are not to happy about that, such as the game makers. They will lose alot of money if the states ban violent video games.
Some states are not waiting for the government to step in, such as Massachusettes. Castillo states, "in Massachusetts, action has been taken against violent video games. Specifically, operators of four rest stops have removed -- at the state's request -- arcade games with guns or 'shooting components,' said Sara Lavoie, a spokeswoman for Massachusetts' Department of Transportation." I do not think that video games are the sole reason for the violence going on in the country, but it desensitizes the player from the real world and causes them to have those images ingrained in their minds. Violent arcade games should not be at state funded rest stops.
Massachusettes is not the only state working on weeding out violence. Castillo explains, "In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal -- like Dewhurst, a Republican -- on Friday proposed legislation to join 17 other states and make mental health records part of the screening criteria for federal background checks to buy firearms." To me, this is a wonderful idea. Guns are not the bad guys, but the one who shoots the gun to intentionally hurt someone should not be allowed to purchase a weapon.
In my opinion, violent video games are not the big cause to mass destruction. The person who is the one that holds the gun should be to blame. I do not the think the government should take away our guns because then what would we have to protect ourselves. Complete gun control is not the answer.
Due to the mass murder in Conneticut, the U.S. is in a tail spin looking for the right answer. What would this world be without guns? Remember that it is not the guns fault, but the person who uses that gun is to blame.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Current Connection #2
Article: "Wolf-McGinnis auction draws interest from around the world"
Author: Donetta Sterling
When most people think of antiques, they automatically believe that they are old pieces of junk that old people collect. But according to the Wolf and McGinnis family, antiques are old treasures that need to be protected. In the recent article "Wolf-McGinnis auction draws interest from the world," Donetta Sterling informs readers of the background story to the antique auction taking place.
Now deceased, Alexander McGinnis and John Wolf's antique collection is being sold in a pretty big auction. Sterling explains, "bidders from around the world are hoping to get their hands on some very rare items that belonged to natives Alexander 'Clyde' McGinnis and John Quincy Wolf Jr. along with their wives, have managed to collect rooms of antiques, Indian relics, coins, glass and more." Apparently the Wolf and McGinnis couples collected the antiques for many years and took great care of them.
Sterling interviewed the daughters of the two families, Mrs. Healy and Mrs. Grilli, digging up information on the story behind the antiques. Mrs. Healy, sharing her parents love for the old relics, states, "'I like to think of the many times my parents went to auctions and wanted others to have the same experience,'Healy said.' My parents would be so pleased.'" I like to think of Mrs. Healy as very kind because she chose to give away her parents prized possessions instead keeping them all for herself. Although, I am sure she kept some.
Mrs. Grilli apparently had the same spirit as Mrs. Healy because she too is selling her parents treasures. Sterling, interviewing Grilli, explains, "Grilli said that she and her sister, Florence Calaway, had already taken the items they wanted and there's too much left to try to keep. Grilli said she hopes whoever buys the items will them as much as her parents did." Hopefully the next owners of the timeless antiques will take great responsibility of them as McGinnis and Wolf did. It would be a shame if they did not.
I, for one, love antiques. When I see them, I feel as if I am going back in time. I love exploring the shelves of antique stores and I hope to collect some once I actually have money.
McGinnis and Wolf obviously had a deep respect for old treasures and hopefully someone with as much love for antiques will buy them at the auction.
Author: Donetta Sterling
When most people think of antiques, they automatically believe that they are old pieces of junk that old people collect. But according to the Wolf and McGinnis family, antiques are old treasures that need to be protected. In the recent article "Wolf-McGinnis auction draws interest from the world," Donetta Sterling informs readers of the background story to the antique auction taking place.
Now deceased, Alexander McGinnis and John Wolf's antique collection is being sold in a pretty big auction. Sterling explains, "bidders from around the world are hoping to get their hands on some very rare items that belonged to natives Alexander 'Clyde' McGinnis and John Quincy Wolf Jr. along with their wives, have managed to collect rooms of antiques, Indian relics, coins, glass and more." Apparently the Wolf and McGinnis couples collected the antiques for many years and took great care of them.
Sterling interviewed the daughters of the two families, Mrs. Healy and Mrs. Grilli, digging up information on the story behind the antiques. Mrs. Healy, sharing her parents love for the old relics, states, "'I like to think of the many times my parents went to auctions and wanted others to have the same experience,'Healy said.' My parents would be so pleased.'" I like to think of Mrs. Healy as very kind because she chose to give away her parents prized possessions instead keeping them all for herself. Although, I am sure she kept some.
Mrs. Grilli apparently had the same spirit as Mrs. Healy because she too is selling her parents treasures. Sterling, interviewing Grilli, explains, "Grilli said that she and her sister, Florence Calaway, had already taken the items they wanted and there's too much left to try to keep. Grilli said she hopes whoever buys the items will them as much as her parents did." Hopefully the next owners of the timeless antiques will take great responsibility of them as McGinnis and Wolf did. It would be a shame if they did not.
I, for one, love antiques. When I see them, I feel as if I am going back in time. I love exploring the shelves of antique stores and I hope to collect some once I actually have money.
McGinnis and Wolf obviously had a deep respect for old treasures and hopefully someone with as much love for antiques will buy them at the auction.
Monday, November 19, 2012
Religious freedom: When does it go too far?
The freedom of religion, used by most Americans, is one of the greatest rights a citizen can have. We have the right to choose what to believe in, and not be persecuted for the decisions we make. But where does it go too far? For instance, if a religion required human sacrifces would that religion still be tolerated? Understanding the rules of this country, I would say no because it's murder, which is illegal in the United States. However, if the freedom of religion is expressed in that way, isn't that their right? Where is the line crossed? These problems must be addressed,
Thursday, October 4, 2012
1st Book Review: Inkheart
Sometimes when you're reading a book, you feel like your living it. You can see the character, feel the air, and hear the conversations taking place. Kind of like a movie in your head. Well in this trilogy the book actually comes to life. Cornelia Funke's Inkheart pulled me into her book within a book.
There are a lot of characters in this book; too many to list so I'll just tell you about the really important ones. The story starts off with a 12 year old girl named Meggie. She lives with her father Mortimer, a skilled bookbinder. But her father has a secret. One that he has not even told Meggie. And one day the truth is revealed. Dustfinger, a "fire-eater," comes to Mortimer warning him of an evil villain, a man named Capricorn. You see, one night Mo (that's Mortimer's nickname) was reading a book called Inkheart aloud to his wife Resa and 2 year old Meggie, and all of a sudden three men appear. Not men of this world but the world of Inkheart. Dustfinger, Capricorn, and Basta, a man who loves his knife, all appear but Resa disappears into the book taking the places of the men. When Mo reads out loud out of a book, the words and characters come to life. Capricorn wants to use Mo's gift for evil, taking treasure out of books and such. Meggie soon discovers she also has the gift and with the help of Fenoglio, the author of Inkheart, destroy Capricorn.
The setting of this story mainly takes place in Capricorns fortress,a dark place covered in shadows, in Northern Italy. Mostly all of the action takes place here, but you'll have to read the book to find out about all that good stuff. But some of the book is in the house of Elinor, Resa's aunt who is obsessed with books.
This book sort of reminds me of the movie Inception. The film is about a dream within a dream, within a dream, within a dream, and so on. It is a really confusing movie and the book is not half as bewildering, but it still reminds me of the movie. They also made a movie based on the book Inkheart but it was not as good as the book. But is the movie ever than the book?
I recommend this book for people who love books, lots of evil villains, and action. But this book is a series so you will have to read all three to know how the story turns out.
There are a lot of characters in this book; too many to list so I'll just tell you about the really important ones. The story starts off with a 12 year old girl named Meggie. She lives with her father Mortimer, a skilled bookbinder. But her father has a secret. One that he has not even told Meggie. And one day the truth is revealed. Dustfinger, a "fire-eater," comes to Mortimer warning him of an evil villain, a man named Capricorn. You see, one night Mo (that's Mortimer's nickname) was reading a book called Inkheart aloud to his wife Resa and 2 year old Meggie, and all of a sudden three men appear. Not men of this world but the world of Inkheart. Dustfinger, Capricorn, and Basta, a man who loves his knife, all appear but Resa disappears into the book taking the places of the men. When Mo reads out loud out of a book, the words and characters come to life. Capricorn wants to use Mo's gift for evil, taking treasure out of books and such. Meggie soon discovers she also has the gift and with the help of Fenoglio, the author of Inkheart, destroy Capricorn.
The setting of this story mainly takes place in Capricorns fortress,a dark place covered in shadows, in Northern Italy. Mostly all of the action takes place here, but you'll have to read the book to find out about all that good stuff. But some of the book is in the house of Elinor, Resa's aunt who is obsessed with books.
This book sort of reminds me of the movie Inception. The film is about a dream within a dream, within a dream, within a dream, and so on. It is a really confusing movie and the book is not half as bewildering, but it still reminds me of the movie. They also made a movie based on the book Inkheart but it was not as good as the book. But is the movie ever than the book?
I recommend this book for people who love books, lots of evil villains, and action. But this book is a series so you will have to read all three to know how the story turns out.
The Presidential Debate
In Andy Sullivan's recent article "Analysis: Romney Scores in Debate, but will it be Enough?" he ponders on whether the October 3rd debate was enough to pull Gov. Mitt Romney through.
The Presidential election is coming up fast. Romney wins this debate but will it be enough to make him president? A lot of people do not think so.
"Romney won. The real surprise is that he won so clearly," said Paul Sracic, a political scientist professor at Youngstown State University. Voters seem to agree with him. President Obama, the first African American president, may have lost by a long shot but he steered clear of saying stupid statements that would cause his supporters to rethink their choice. Many pollsters expect Obama's polls to go down somewhat, but debates hardly have a huge impact. Opinion polls have only shifted an average of 1 percent in the wake of the 16 presidential debates since 1988. President Obama was in the lead, and he might still be. Was this debate enough for Romney?
Personally, I think both men would be a good President. Obama pulled us out of a recession (somewhat), but Romney has some pretty good ideas. I am the type of girl who votes for the person and not the party. Both men have good platforms. I am just wondering who is going to make it.
This presidential election will have a huge impact on our future. And it's up to voters to decide our future. Romney won the first debate but who will win the next? Unfortunately I cannot vote, but I would if I could. We're all wondering who will win... Romney or Obama?
The Presidential election is coming up fast. Romney wins this debate but will it be enough to make him president? A lot of people do not think so.
"Romney won. The real surprise is that he won so clearly," said Paul Sracic, a political scientist professor at Youngstown State University. Voters seem to agree with him. President Obama, the first African American president, may have lost by a long shot but he steered clear of saying stupid statements that would cause his supporters to rethink their choice. Many pollsters expect Obama's polls to go down somewhat, but debates hardly have a huge impact. Opinion polls have only shifted an average of 1 percent in the wake of the 16 presidential debates since 1988. President Obama was in the lead, and he might still be. Was this debate enough for Romney?
Personally, I think both men would be a good President. Obama pulled us out of a recession (somewhat), but Romney has some pretty good ideas. I am the type of girl who votes for the person and not the party. Both men have good platforms. I am just wondering who is going to make it.
This presidential election will have a huge impact on our future. And it's up to voters to decide our future. Romney won the first debate but who will win the next? Unfortunately I cannot vote, but I would if I could. We're all wondering who will win... Romney or Obama?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)